Post from Raban on actions... From: J Hooten To: PBEM List References: <200904210657.n3L6vubT033385@mxdrop216.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200904210657.n3L6vubT033385@mxdrop216.xs4all.nl> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at ispmxfep08-srv.windstream.net from [98.16.128.53] using ID Subject: Re: [pnpgm] Ruling on Oblivion... Just a quick response on this: PnP in a few places has stated that innate powers cannot Abysmal, in others it says spells powered by Enl cannot abysmal. Thus the straight answer would be [No], no Abysmal no sent to Oblivion BUT since you do not use the same Abysmal System, that aspect was wide open again anyway. I like your approach on Ptoth, it does make it interesting when you have to wonder what could happen to what you send away. Personally I would not automatically let it go with the caster but make that an option for added cost. One early use is to send something away so you can escape, that use is gone if it is attached to you as you cant get away. If Attached relative to the caster then it can be abused by relocating the return point over a cliff etc And here is the fun problem, if the anchor is the caster and he gets sent away by an abysmal....he cannot ever return! Permanent Statue in Ptoth's garden Or one that wakes and wanders about after the duration expires Scott Adams wrote: > > Book 2 p.32 OBLIVION An Innate user of this spell using Energy Level > rather than trained Casting Ability rolls Abysmal Failure - is the > caster sent to Oblivion? [No] > > > GM: From some errata stuff. Looks like Questions to Richard and not > sure if you answered or he did. But to me that denies > divine punishment. :< > > _______________________________________________ pnpgm mailing list pnpgm@abroere.xs4all.nl http://abroere.xs4all.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm